Special Announcement - Now Screening for FDA Approved Stem Cell Study
Dr. Mitchell Sheinkop has completed training and is credentialed for an FDA-approved stem cell clinical trial for knee arthritis. Our clinic is now screening patients for this trial. Contact us at 312-475-1893 for details. Click here to learn more.

Why the need for restoration of articular cartilage

Cartilage damage may result from trauma, repetitive motion/impact, abrupt abnormal weight bearing, fractures, wear/degeneration, joint infection, meniscectomy,  friction/abrasion due to abnormal joint alignment, inflammatory diseases or a genetic predisposition to name a few reasons. The primary symptoms are pain, loss of motion and functional impairment.

As a form of connective tissue that is very primitive from an evolutionary standpoint, cartilage does not lend itself to intrinsic repair. All the attributes required for healing, while present in bone, are missing in cartilage including blood vessel supply, pain fibers, regenerative cells, fluid balance, and a rich source of nutrition.  The cartilage in your joint is not populated by metabolically active cells nor is the chondrocyte capable of positively influencing  its own environment. In keeping with all of the principal shortcomings of cartilage, chondrocytes do not replicate after age 40 and cannot migrate.

Because articular cartilage damage from any of the aforementioned causes is permanent and progressive, it is paramount that intervention takes place early in the degenerative process or soon after injury. The likelihood of a successful, enduring repair or restoration diminishes as generalized cartilage deterioration progresses.

There are many palliative interventions available such as weight loss, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication, shoe wedges, off-loader braces, cortisone injections, gels/visco-supplementation, and most recently, amniotic fluid concentrates. Missing though from all of these options is the regenerative potential. Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate not only introduces regenerative potential via adult mesenchymal stem cells, it is a huge resource for anti-inflammatory molecules termed cytokines. Equally important though are the extracellular vesicles (exosomes) termed growth factors.  What about adipose derived stem cells and cultured stem cells?

While adipose tissue contains stem cells, the latter are not available unless liberated from their surroundings. An enzyme, collagenase has been the necessary ingredient but the use of collagenase is interpreted as tissue manipulation and thus not allowed by the FDA. While there was an introduction last July of a mechanical means of liberating stem cells from fat graft harvest, there are no outcomes as of yet to support said alternative. At the same time, while adipose derived stem cells have been used outside of the US, there are no studies indicating better outcomes with adipose derived cells as compared to bone marrow derived stem cells. The remaining question at this time is whether the results of cultured stem cells are superior to Regenexx SD outcomes. While there is anecdote, we have no Evidence Based Information to help guide Clinical Appropriate Use Criteria.

With all the above written, I am  done for today; if you are still unclear or uncertain, call the office for an appointment.

847 390 7666

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Continuing Cartilage Restoration Education

Physicians should be in a constant state of education to keep their skills and knowledge at the forefront so that their patients get the best care possible. At the same time, I personally have devoted over 40 years to integrating patient care with research and education be it directed to joint replacement, and for the past four years, to postponing and at times, avoiding joint replacement. As the vast majority of health professionals, I strive on a daily basis to meet the need of my patients. Each and every patient for whom I provide care is entered into a HIPAA compliant outcomes database. From time to time, results are extracted from that data-base and presented at Cellular Orthopedic meetings. Soon we will be submitting the outcomes of several clinical trials for statistical analysis and publication. Almost every therapeutic intervention I recommend is based on science and statistically significant outcomes; rarely on anecdote.

The emerging field of regenerative medicine aims to deal with arthritis and cartilage injury by providing the required elements (cells, inductive molecules, and local environment) to promote true joint and cartilage regeneration. Cellular Regenerative Medicine is rapidly evolving and changing on an almost weekly basis. This is both good news and bad news as there are those who would try to prosper through marketing rather than science. Witness the invitation I received last week to travel to the Bahamas for stem cell care based on anecdote; or the advertisement for the “opportunity” to attend a weekend course to teach me how to use adipose tissue for every malady in the human body. How is it possible to track outcomes from medical tourism or to teach adipose related cellular orthopedic intervention when the latter is not FDA approved?

To assure you that I remain in the forefront of Cellular Orthopedics, from March 31-April 2, 2016, I will be participating in a Continuing Educational course, Articular Cartilage Restoration: The Modern Frontier, sponsored by the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons. This is a premier skills course that provides hands-on exposure and practice for the most updated techniques in cartilage restoration while allowing for a contemporary overview of established and new procedures to treat the entire knee joint for cartilage damage ranging from focal defects to arthritis.

Although I no longer am involved with orthopedic resident education, as Professor Emeritus at Rush, I have taken the Interventional Orthopedics Foundation pledge to continue to integrate my clinical interventions with outcomes surveillance. Several scientific presentations at the early March meeting of the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons resulted because of my ongoing initiatives. I am the orthopedic surgeon who four years ago, exchanged a scalpel for a stem cell.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

On Published Regenerative Medicine Articles in Scientific Journals

In a commercial advertisement appearing on page 3 of the Monday, March 14, 2016 Chicago Tribune, a claim by the Osteo Relief Institute bases, in part, the validity of a “cutting-edge” treatment-Viscosupplementation intervention-on an article published in the Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy. Having published over 100 scientific papers in peer reviewed journals and never having heard of the Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy; I looked up the Journal to learn it is an advertising vehicle for the pharmaceutical industry.

From the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons: “AAOS Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines are based on a systematic literature review of published studies. Multidisciplinary guideline development groups construct Evidence-Based Clinical recommendations.” “Although some patients report relief of arthritis symptoms with viscosupplementation, the procedure has never been shown to reverse the arthritic process or re-grow cartilage”. The AAOS no longer supports the use of Viscosupplementation in the treatment of arthritis.

What we do with your stem cells at Regenexx is not only address symptoms of arthritis; based on our clinical trials, data base, and scientific publication documentation, is to improve function while addressing the progression of arthritis at a molecular and bio-immune level. Stem cells, in addition to the cytokines and growth factors in Bone Marrow Concentrate, have the potential to regenerate cartilage. Because of the lack of proven success over 20 years as determined by meta-analysis of the scientific literature concerning viscosupplemenation, the Regenexx network is moving away from offering Hyaluronic acid (Gels) and slowly the insurance industry is dropping coverage as well.

There is no question that the Osteo Relief Institute marketing campaign is attractive to a patient but what about a scientific foundation?  Don’t get me wrong, I too can succumb to well done advertising. The Most Interesting Man in the World ad campaign caused me to switch to Dos Equis beer. Your arthritic related limitation is a totally different matter and your choice of treatment should not be influenced by an advertising campaign. Seek out that which is evidence based and available through board certified physicians and surgeons.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

An exclusive interview with a Cellular Orthopedic Pioneer

While skiing last week in Vail, Colorado, I had the opportunity to sit down with Mitchell Sheinkop, MD, Fellow of the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgery and Fellow of the American College of Surgeons, to learn about the emerging field of Interventional Orthopedics. In 2007, Dr Sheinkop received the Shaare Zedek International Humanitarian Award in recognition of his global orthopedic educational endeavors.
Question: Do stem cells really work?
Answer: There is a misconception regarding joint restoration as it is not the adult mesenchymal stem cell alone that is responsible for postponing or even avoiding a joint replacement in the arthritic setting.

Question: All I read and hear about are stem cells?
Answer: Unfortunately, ad placement hype is competing with good science for the patient’s attention and owing to advertising and marketing; the real message may be getting lost.

Question: Would you please explain?
Answer: When I “graduated” from a knife to a needle, I too believed that it was the stem cell that would morph into cartilage. We now know that the Adult Mesenchymal Stem cell orchestrates the regenerative process and directs other cells and molecules to help reverse the arthritic process, effect healing and improve function.

Question: Who are the members of the orchestra, so to speak?
Answer: When injury occurs, platelets aggregate to initiate the healing process. The activated platelet recruits the cells lining capillaries (pericytes) that then function as stem cells. Control of the bio-immune response and the regeneration affected by anti-inflammatory molecules termed Cytokines and cellular secretions known as Growth Factors are directed by the stem cell.

Question: Where do all of these stem cells, cytokines and growth factors come from?
Answer: When it comes to the musculoskeletal system, we look to the patient’s own Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate as the only FDA tolerated resource .While you may be aware of the potential of adipose tissue as a stem cell resource, in order to liberate the stem cell, fat has to be digested with an enzyme, collagenase. As of this interview, enzymatic digestion is not approved by the FDA nor are there significant scientific studies to support adipose derived stem cells for arthritis.

Question: I am aware of plastic surgeons offering fat graft for arthritis, is it effective and legal?
Answer: Neither but it is expensive. Fat graft is not a source of regeneration; it is filler for cosmetic surgery.

Question: I am aware of a media blitz promoting Amniotic Fluid Concentrate as a source of stem cells?
Answer: The research at the Interventional Orthopedic Foundation demonstrated that while there are stem cells in amniotic fluid along with Hyaluronic acid, anti-inflammatory Cytokines, and Growth Factors when that fluid is harvested in conjunction with a Cesarean section; after processing, freezing and the quick thaw, there are few if any viable stem cells remaining.

Last Question: How might a patient seeking to manage arthritis without surgery make the right therapeutic decision?

Answer: Just as our presidential campaigns, paraphrasing Dahleen Glanton in the Chicago Tribune, Monday, February 22, are a cesspool of empty promises and lies, so too is the marketing of stem cells; witness the advertisement featuring a chiropractic spokesperson in The Chicago Tribune, Tuesday, February 9, 2016, placed by The Stem cell Institute of America.

When you seek a Regenerative Medicine consultation, make sure that physician is fellowship trained, board certified and integrates clinical research with his or her practice.  Don’t depend on anecdote; inquire about outcomes data. In my practice as well as in those other members of the Regenexx Network, we base our clinical decisions and therapeutic recommendations for Cellular Orthopedics on Documented Results.

Mitchell  Sheinkop, MD  accepted Emeritus Professor status as the director of the joint replacement program at Rush University Medical Center six years ago where he had played a major role over 37 years in the development of the department of orthopedics and in the founding and growth of Midwest Orthopedics. Since that time he has played a major role in the emerging field of Interventional Orthopedics.

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Is a lower function score after a Cellular Orthopedic intervention because of your lumbar spine?

Although Orthobiologics and Cellular Orthopedic interventions generally result in excellent pain relief and return to or maintenance of a high degree of function, approximately 20 percent of patients have persistent functional deficits that affect their quality of life as I have learned after review of three and a half  years of Regenexx procedures for the hip and knee.

It looks as if lumbar spine problems are a common cause of functional disability in patients presenting with hip and knee arthritis. While, I didn’t perform a particular study, in reviewing those with less than optimal outcomes from my first three plus years of Regenerative Medical procedures, I observed that patients with a prior history of lumbar spine problems had significantly worse hip and knee functional scores when compared to the majority who did well and had no documentation of a preexisting spinal abnormality.

The results of my observations mirror multiple previous studies that have found poor pre operative and post operative knee and hip function in patients undergoing a joint replacement who had a spinal degenerative co-morbidity. Through the review of our data base, we have identified the problem. Now I must determine the alternatives in dealing with the problem. First of all, from here on out, all new and returning patients will be questioned about their back related symptoms; and when deemed appropriate, images will be requested. If a significant degenerative disc or joint process is identified then the patient will be appropriately advised and referred for timely intervention. As of this writing, the options are either classical pain management or surgical in nature. The good news is that included in classical pain management for the spine is a very successful approach focusing on weight reduction, Pilates core strengthening, and Tai Chi, yoga or stretching. The failure of these non operative approaches is based on the failure of a patient to commit three or four days a week. The next level of pain management is injection based. Historically, an epidural series has been the standard but more recently, Regenexx introduced PRP as a safer and longer lasting approach. As of this writing, Regenexx and others have introduced intradiscal procedures, but I want more outcomes before I recommend such.

As far as what I do for arthritis, there will be more attention to devoted to the patient’s back when we do the intake for an arthritic joint. On the other hand, we do have several improvements and additions in our ever evolving menu of services for the arthritis hip and knee. To learn more, schedule a consultation:

847 390 7666

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Pin It on Pinterest