Nov 16, 2016
This week, I am repeating stem cell/growth factor interventions in two patients; one with arthritis of the
hip, and the other with osteoarthritis of both knees. Four years ago, at the initiation of my interventional
orthopedic practice, I spoke of adult mesenchymal stem cells alone but now we know that Bone Marrow
Concentrate has in addition to the adult mesenchymal stem cells, hematopoietic stem cells, growth
factors and platelets all playing a role in managing the symptoms and the altered functional impairment
attributable to osteoarthritis. The outgrowth is in new speak; namely, Bone Marrow Concentrate and not
just mesenchymal stem cells. When the two patients I alluded to were initially cared for, we had not yet
gained the understanding of the importance of platelets in the regenerative process. Platelets contain
the growth factors and those growth factors are responsible, in addition to Mesenchymal and
Hematopoietic Stem Cells, for regulating cartilage well-being. By having become aware of the
contribution following concentrated platelet rich plasma in conjunction with the bone marrow
concentrate intervention, I believe we are already seeing improved outcomes.
As well, subchondroplasty has been added to our menu of services and the latter is proving very
beneficial in the knee. To refresh your knowledge base, subchondroplasty is a procedure popularized in France where in bone marrow concentrate is injected into the bone marrow adjacent to a joint at the
same time that the stem cell, growth factors and platelet containing concentrate is intervention of the
joint itself is being completed. The value of intervening into the bone supporting the joint is the fact that
there is communication between the joint itself and the supportive subchondral environment. I have
addressed Adult Mesenchymal Stem Cells many times in previous Blogs as the orchestrater of the
healing process. Now we know that Hemopoietic Stem Cells from the marrow contribute as well. Growth
Factors such as Interlukin-1 Receptor Antagonist Protein (IRAP) are present in bone marrow and
circulating blood; It was IRAP alone that extended the professional basketball career of Kobe Bryant by
seven years for an arthritic knee. With an improved means of extracting and activating the growth
factors contained in platelets, the two patients I introduced in the opening sentences of this blog should
enjoy a very satisfactory return to function and recreation.
Interventional Orthopedics is a dynamic process and I continue to learn from the integration of clinical
research and my clinical practice. On Thursday, I will host two very interested scientists dedicated to
customizing biologic preparations and together we will explore how to further leverage scientific
advancements in creating autologous biologic preparations thereby optimizing the practice of
Regenerative Medicine.
Call 312 475 1893 to schedule your consultation
Tags: arthritis, bone marrow, Clinical Trial. Mitchell B. Sheinkop, Concentrated Stem Cell Plasma, Growth Factors, Hematopoietic Stem Cells, Interlukin-1 Receptor Antagonist Protein, IRAP, joint replacement, Osteoarthritis, Platelet Rich Plasma, PRP, Regenerative Pain Center
Nov 1, 2016
The FDA again held a meeting to address issues pertaining to Regenerative Medicine. At the conclusion of the meeting, an updated set of guidelines was developed for patient protection in the use of stem cells, growth factors, and platelet rich plasma. While still being interpreted by the Regenerative Medicine community, what becomes clear is the call for better self-regulation. It is not ethical or acceptable for anyone holding themselves out to be practicing cellular medicine to hold a seminar, recruit a patient, inject some substance into a joint and request payment. Equally important are the credentials of that practitioner.
For the past four and a half years, I have followed the outcomes of all my patients using the same subjective and objective parameters in my practice of Interventional Orthopedics that I used to follow the results during my joint replacement career. Over that 37-year span, because of my data collection initiative, many new generations of Hip and Knee Prostheses were introduced into adult reconstructive orthopedic surgery. Statistical analysis of data allows for progress in care and development of new product. Today, I still gather outcomes data for each patient. That initiative has led to refinement and advances in the emerging subspecialty of Regenerative Medicine; both in my own practice and around the globe.
Anticipating the future, I am headed off this upcoming weekend to join a small group of those looking to the future in advancing the practice of cellular medicine. Up until now, our data collection and Outcomes registry was clinical in nature; in a short time, that data will also include cellular data. This latter is the next way to refine the practice of regenerative medicine.
By having tighter control over the composition of autologous PRP and BMC preparations for use in my practice of regenerative medicine, through comprehensive analysis of autologous patient samples, I will have a chance to see what levels of important constituents like Stem Cells, Growth Factors, Platelets, RBCs, WBCs, and so on are present in the preparation.
How might I take advantage of the data? The most obvious use would be for me to record values of your sample analysis in a spreadsheet and enter in demographic and clinical outcomes data. I will continue to enter your results of outcomes assessments obtained during follow-up visits that I routinely use to monitor your recovery. By applying this strategy to all patients I treat, an internal database will inform me about optimization strategies for treating my patients, allowing me to modify and customize the make-up of that which will be injected. Why go to the trouble, you might be asking yourself? Having a detailed knowledge of what I am injecting into my patient puts me in a position to refine my practice of regenerative medicine. And that is a good thing, since you the patient ultimately will benefit from my optimizing the use of autologous materials like PRP and BMC.
To schedule your appointment call 312 475 1893
Tags: arthritis, BMC, Bone Marrow Concentrate, Clinical Trial. Mitchell B. Sheinkop, Concentrated Stem Cell Plasma, Growth Factors, Hip Replacement, Interventional Orthopedics, joint replacement, Knee Pain Relief, knee replacement, Osteoarthritis, Pain Management, Platelet Rich Plasma, platelets, PRP, regenerative medicine, stem cells, Ultrasound Guided Injection
Apr 18, 2016
Articulate cartilage has little to no capacity to undergo spontaneous repair because it has no blood supply nor is it able to regenerate across a physical gap. In order to restore cartilage in a skeletally mature patient, there is a need for outside help. In some settings, osteochondral transfer (bone with cartilage) may be harvested from elsewhere in a damaged joint and repositioned or relocated in that joint. In other settings, fresh cadaveric tissue (allograft) may be used. More recently, attempts have been directed at “engineering” cartilage. For engineering to take place, there are three requirements. First must come a matrix scaffold necessary to support tissue formation. Second are cells such as mesenchymal stem cells either from bone marrow or synovial membrane lining the joint. Third comes signaling molecules (cytokines) and growth factors. Platelet Rich Plasma is a source of signaling molecules. While Bone Marrow Concentrate doesn’t meet every need for tissue engineering, to the best of my knowledge at this time, there is nothing superior for a long term successful outcome either as an adjunct to a surgical procedure for a small defect or as a primary intervention for an arthritic joint.
There are several ways to measure success after an attempt at cartilage repair. For a contained or global defect, MRI is the primary outcome measure; whereas for osteoarthritis, the Outcome objective metrics I use have proven statistically significant and reproducible. I write this Blog in between presentations by the faculty at American Academy of Orthopedic Surgery Program: Articular Cartilage Restoration-The Modern Frontier. I came here to learn and learn I did about surgical procedures for contained injury. When it comes to osteoarthritis, I learned little but contributed much. No, I am not being egotistical, I am reporting what transpired at the meeting and what is transpiring in my practice. Of interest is the universal agreement by those treating the global defect with surgery and those of us who treat osteoarthritis with stem cells; including the supporting bone ( bone marrow edema)in the therapeutic algorithm via subchodndroplasty is paramount.
“He, who has data, need not shout”
Tags: Amniotic, arthritis, athletes, Benefits and Risk, bone marrow, Bone Marrow Concentrate, Hip Replacement, Interventional Orthopedics, Knee Pain Relief, Mature Athlete, medicine, Orthopedic Care, Orthopedic Surgeon, Orthopedics, Osteoarthritis, Pain Management, Platelet Rich Plasma, Regenerative, Regenexx, stem cells, treatment
Apr 4, 2016
Patients should participate in strengthening, low-impact aerobic exercises, and neuromuscular education; and engage in physical activity.
Rationale:
This recommendation is rated strong because of seven high-strength studies of which five showed beneficial outcomes. The exercise interventions were predominantly conducted under supervision, most often by a physical therapist.
I recommend weight loss for patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee and a BMI = 25.
Rationale:
Physical Function shows important improvement in outcomes for this patient population. Function also shows statistical improvement that is clinically significant. Diet and exercise combined achieves the best results.
I do not recommend using acupuncture in patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee
Rationale:
In Studies that comparing acupuncture to groups receiving non-intervention sham, usual care, or education, the majority, show no clinically significant improvement. While there is a lack of efficacy, there is no potential harm.
I am unable to recommend for or against the use of physical agents (including electrotherapeutic modalities) in patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee.
Rationale:
Due to the overall scientifically inconsistent findings for various physical agents and electrotherapeutic modalities, I am unable to make a recommendation for or against their use in patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee. To better understand the role of pulses in the management of arthritis, I am waiting for FDA approval to launch a clinical trial using a pulsed brace after a bone marrow concentrate/stem cell procedure.
I am unable to recommend for or against manual therapy in patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee.
Rationale:
Due to the lack of studies examining most manual therapy techniques, I am unable to opine. No studies evaluating joint mobilization, joint manipulation, chiropractic therapy, patellar mobilization, or myofascial release were found of scientific merit.
I cannot recommend using glucosamine and chondroitin for patients based on science; yet I personally use them
Rationale:
At this time, both glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate have been extensively studied. There is essentially no evidence that minimum clinically important outcomes have been achieved compared to placebo. There is no evidence of potential harm. The same may be said of the neutraceuticals methylsulfonylmethane, omega-3, gelatin, vitamin D, dimethylsulfoxide, antioxidants, and coenzyme Q10. 01
I will not use needle lavage for patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee.
Rationale:
The published evidence shows little or no benefit from needle lavage in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee.
I am able to recommend growth factors and stem cells derived from Bone Marrow Aspirate in conjunction with platelet rich plasma for patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee.
Rationale:
I have an ever-increasing Data-Base of Outcome measurements to support my recommendations with Levels of Evidence at 1B and 3 with a Grade D governmental guideline Grading (the highest). You may learn more at the National Guideline Clearinghouse (http://www.guidelines.gov) or make an appointment at 847 390 7666
Tags: arthritis, athletes, Benefits and Risk, bone marrow, Bone Marrow Concentrate, Clinical Trial. Mitchell B. Sheinkop, Concentrated Stem Cell Plasma, Hip Replacement, Interventional Orthopedics, Knee, Knee Pain Relief, Mature Athlete, medicine, Orthopedic Care, Orthopedics, Osteoarthritis, Pain Management, Platelet Rich Plasma, Regenerative, Regenexx, Regenexx-SD, stem cells, treatment
Jan 25, 2016
Although Orthobiologics and Cellular Orthopedic interventions generally result in excellent pain relief and return to or maintenance of a high degree of function, approximately 20 percent of patients have persistent functional deficits that affect their quality of life as I have learned after review of three and a half years of Regenexx procedures for the hip and knee.
It looks as if lumbar spine problems are a common cause of functional disability in patients presenting with hip and knee arthritis. While, I didn’t perform a particular study, in reviewing those with less than optimal outcomes from my first three plus years of Regenerative Medical procedures, I observed that patients with a prior history of lumbar spine problems had significantly worse hip and knee functional scores when compared to the majority who did well and had no documentation of a preexisting spinal abnormality.
The results of my observations mirror multiple previous studies that have found poor pre operative and post operative knee and hip function in patients undergoing a joint replacement who had a spinal degenerative co-morbidity. Through the review of our data base, we have identified the problem. Now I must determine the alternatives in dealing with the problem. First of all, from here on out, all new and returning patients will be questioned about their back related symptoms; and when deemed appropriate, images will be requested. If a significant degenerative disc or joint process is identified then the patient will be appropriately advised and referred for timely intervention. As of this writing, the options are either classical pain management or surgical in nature. The good news is that included in classical pain management for the spine is a very successful approach focusing on weight reduction, Pilates core strengthening, and Tai Chi, yoga or stretching. The failure of these non operative approaches is based on the failure of a patient to commit three or four days a week. The next level of pain management is injection based. Historically, an epidural series has been the standard but more recently, Regenexx introduced PRP as a safer and longer lasting approach. As of this writing, Regenexx and others have introduced intradiscal procedures, but I want more outcomes before I recommend such.
As far as what I do for arthritis, there will be more attention to devoted to the patient’s back when we do the intake for an arthritic joint. On the other hand, we do have several improvements and additions in our ever evolving menu of services for the arthritis hip and knee. To learn more, schedule a consultation:
847 390 7666
Tags: arthritis, Benefits and Risk, Bone Marrow Concentrate, Hip, Hip Replacement, Interventional Orthopedics, Knee, Knee Pain Relief, Mature Athlete, medicine, Orthopedic Care, Orthopedic Surgeon, Orthopedics, Osteoarthritis, Pain Management, Platelet Rich Plasma, PRP, Regenerative, Regenexx, Regenexx-SD, stem cells, treatment
